CHAPTER 12 FIGURES

To see full-size figures, just click the thumbnails. To download high-resolution PDF versions for printing, please click here. 

Figure 12.01
Schematic diagram of ozone production
12.01
Figure 12.02
CFC-12 zonally averaged concentrations as a function of height with arrows showing stratospheric circulation pattern
12.02
Figure 12.03
Schematic diagram of a box model
12.03
Figure 12.04
Modeled HCl concentrations reaching a photochemical equilibrium state over the course of a 3-week box model run
12.04
Figure 12.05
Modeled ClO concentrations reaching a diurnal cycle photochemical equilibrium state over the course of a 3-week box model run
12.05
Figure 12.06
Comparison of box model and ER-2 suite observations of stratospheric free radical diurnal variability
12.06
Figure 12.07
Making an air parcel trajectory map
12.07
Figure 12.08
ER-2 flight data of temperature differences vs ClO concentrations: minimum temp. based on 10-day back trajectory
12.08
Figure 12.09
Evolution of contours of potential vorticity using a 10-day back trajectory model for March 10, 1993, on 850 K surface
12.09
Figure 12.10
Satellite picture of cloud distribution over North America
12.10
Figure 12.11
Map of SBUV-measured individual ozone observations made over the course of a 24-hr period on February 15, 1992
12.11
Figure 12.12
Map of SBUV-measured ozone observations on February 15, 1992, run by a trajectory model forward and backward
12.12
Figure 12.13
Comparison of satellite measured CFC-12 zonal mean distribution with height to GSFC 2-D zonal mean model for September 1992
12.13
Figure 12.14
Comparison of satellite measured ClO zonal mean distribution with height to 2-D zonal mean model for August-October 1992 data: difference shown in bottom panel as a way of illustrating overprediction problem
12.14
Figure 12.15
Comparison of satellite measured ozone zonal mean distribution with height to 2-Dd zonal mean model for September 1992: difference shown in bottom panel
12.15
Figure 12.16
Long-term projections of atmospheric chlorine concentrations based on each of the international CFC agreements
12.16
Figure 12.17
WMO 1994 and 1998 assessments and long-term forecasts (1970-2050) for four different constituents important to stratospheric ozone concentrations
12.17
Figure 12.18
Annual average ozone trend between 1979-2000 for 65°S to 65°N (global avg.) as predicted by an ensemble of ten 2-D ozone models: trends compared to 1979-1997 TOMS measured data for validation
12.18
Figure 12.19
Annual average ozone trend between 1979-2050 for 65°S to 65°N (global avg.) as predicted by an ensemble of ten 2-D ozone models: trends compared to 1979-1997 TOMS measured data for validation
12.19
Figure 12.20
Percent changes in total ozone from 1979 for 65°S to 65°N (global avg.) based on different input assumptions
12.20
Figure 12.21
Percent reduction in ozone column over the South Pole as predicted by three 2-D models for 1979-2050: comparisons to South Pole ozonesondes shown for validation
12.21